A Working Definition of critical thinking by Michael Scriven and Richard Paul

 

Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and

skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or

evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation,

experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief

and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual

values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy,

precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth,

breadth, and fairness. It entails the examination of those structures or

elements of thought implicit in all reasoning: purpose, problem, or

question-at-issue, assumptions, concepts, empirical grounding; reasoning

leading to conclusions, implications and consequences, objections from

alternative viewpoints, and frame of reference. Critical thinking - in being

responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes - is

incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking, among them:

scientific thinking, mathematical thinking, historical thinking,

anthropological thinking, economic thinking, moral thinking, and

philosophical thinking.

 

Critical thinking can be seen as having two components:

 

1. a set of skills to process and generate information and beliefs, and

2. the habit, based on intellectual commitment, of using those skills to

guide behavior.

 

It is thus to be contrasted with:

 

1. the mere acquisition and retention of information alone, (because it

involves a particular way in which information is sought and treated,)

2. the mere possession of a set of skills, (because it involves the

continual use of them,) and

3. the mere use of those skills ("as an exercise") without acceptance of

their results.

 

Critical thinking varies according to the motivation underlying it. When

grounded in selfish motives, it is often manifested in the skillful

manipulation of ideas in service to one's own, or one's groups', vested

interest. As such, it is typically intellectually flawed, however

pragmatically successful it might be. When grounded in fairmindedness and

intellectual integrity, it is typically of a higher order intellectually,

though subject to the charge of "idealism" by those habituated to its

selfish use.

 

Critical thinking of any kind is never universal in any individual; everyone

is subject to episodes of undisciplined or irrational thought. Its quality

is therefore usually a matter of degree and dependent on, among other

things, the quality and depth of experience in a given domain of thinking or

with respect to a particular class of questions. No one is a critical

thinker through-and-through, but only to such-and-such a degree, with

such-and-such insights and blind spots, subject to such-and-such tendencies

towards self-delusion. For this reason, the development of critical thinking

skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor.

 

Three Definitions of Critical Thinking


 

Return to the Main Page